Preview
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar hunter. and address) FOR COURT USE ONLY Pom_ Mohammad Muhareb SBN: 290391 | Muhareb Law Group 9327 Fairway View P| Ste 106 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ELECTRON ICALLY FILED TELEPHONE N0.: (909) 519-5832 FAX NO. IE-MAIL ADDRESS . (Optional): muhavemeuhateblawgroupmm SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY FOR (Name) Plalnhfi‘ Chrishan x Fillingame, an Indlmdua| COU NTY OF SAN BERNARDIN() SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT 5/1 5/2024 2:30 PM SA" BERNARD'N° “""a' DEPUTY By: Rina Phillips, STREET ADDRESS: 247 W Third St MAILING ADDRESS CITY AND ZIP CODE. SAN BERNARDINO, CA 9241 5 BRANCH NAME: SAN BERNARDINO Central PLAINTIFF: Christian Fillingame, an Individual CASE NUMBER; DEFENDANT: New Legend, |nc.. a Corporation CIVSBZ317559 Rel No‘ or FIIe Nov: PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS Christian Fillingame1. At the time of service | was at least 18 years of age and not a pany to this action.2. I served copies of: a. M Summons b. Complaint C. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) package d. D Civil Case Cover Sheet (served in complex cases only) 6- Cross-complaint f- other (specify documents): Civil Case Cover Sheet; Certificate 0f Assignment: Amendment to Complaint; Superior Coun of California - County of San Bernardino Alternative Dispute Resolution3. a. Party served (specify name ofpany as shown on documents served): Clint Murphy, Doe 1 b. D Person (other than the party in item 3a) served on behalf of an entity or as an authorized agent (and not a person under item 5b on whom substituted service was made) (specify name and relationship to the party named in item 33):4. Address where the party was served: 356 Pleasant View Dr Kerrville, TX 78028-1 622 5. | served the party (check proper box) a. by personal service. | personally delivered the documents listed in item 2 to the party or person authorized to receive service of process for the party (1) on (date): (2) at (time): b- E by substituted service. On (date): 517/2024 at in the presence of (name and title or relationship to (time):7:10 PM left the documents | person indicated in item 3b): listed in item 2 with or (John Doe) - Father Age: - Welght: 175 lbs Hair: Grey Sex: Male Height: 6'0" Eyes: - Race: Caucasian (1) D (business) a person at least 18 years of age apparently in charge at the office or usual place of business of the person to be served. informed him of her of the general nature of the papers. | (2) M (home) a competent member of the household (at least 18 years of age) at the dwelling house abode of the party. informed him or her of the general nature of the papers. | or usual place of (3) D (physical address unknown) a person at least 18 years of age apparently in charge at the usual mailing address of the person to be served. other (han a United States Postal Service post office box. informed him of l her of the general nature of the papers. (4) D Ithereafter mailed (by first-cIass. postage prepaid) copies of the documents to the person to be sewed at the place where the copies were left (Code Civ. Proc., §415.20). mailed the documents on I (date): from (city): a declaration of mailing is attached. (5) E | attach a declaration of dlllgence stating actions taken first to attempt personal service. Page 1 o! 2 Code o! Civil Procedure. § 417.10 Form raved for Mandatory Use Judldal POS~010 ndl ofCalWomla PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS P0501 0-1 [526219 [Rem January 1. 2007] PETITIONER: Christian Fllllngamo, an lndlvldual CASE NUMBERI CIVSBZ317659 RESPONDENT: New Legend, Inc., a Corporation c_ D by mail and acknowledgment of receipt of service. l mailed the documents listed in item 2 to the party. to the address shown in item 4, by first-class mail, postage prepaid. (1) on (date): (2) from (city): (3)D with two copies of the Notice and Acknowledgment of Receipt and a postage-paid return envelope addressed to me. (Attach completed Notice and Acknowledgement of Receipt.) (Code Civ. Proc., § 41 5.30.) (MD to an address outside California with return receipt requested. (Code Civ. Proc., § 415.40.) d, D by other means (specify means of service and authorizing code section): D Additional page describing service is attached.6. The "Notice to the Person Served" (on the summons) was completed as follows: a- D as an individual defendant. b. as the person sued under the fictitious name of (specify): Doe 1 C. as occupant. d- On behalf of (specify): Clint Murphy under the following Code of Civil Procedure section: D 416.10 (corporation) D 415.95 (business organization, form unknown) D 416.20 (defunct corporation) D 416.60 (minor) D 416.30 (joint stock company/association) D 415-70 (ward 0r conservatee) D 416.40 (association or partnership) D 416-90 (aUthOTiZed Person) D 416.50 (public entity) 415.46 (occupant) g other: CCP4747. Person who served papers a.Name: Brian H. Thomas DDS Legal Support - . Address: 2900 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 0000' . Telephone number: (714) 662-5555 . The fee for service was: S 167.90 . I am: (1) not a registered California process server. Out of State Process Server. (2) exempt from registration under Business and Professions Code section 22350(b). re istered California p ess server: (3) (i) owner employee D independentcontractor. (ii) Registration No.: (iii) County:3, M l declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. or9, D I am a California sheriff or marshal and | certify that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: 5/9/2024 DDS Legal Support£1 2900 Bristol Street Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (714) 662-5555 www.ddslegal.com (NAME OF PERSON BrianJLIngmas WHO SERVED PAPERS/SHERIFF OR MARSHAL) b EMA ” (SIGNATURE)posm [Rummy 1. zoon moor: 0F SERVICE 0F SUMMONS Posmgggz‘:
Related Contentin San Bernardino County
Case
Barrios -v- Etiwanda Logistics, Inc. et al Print
Jul 23, 2024 |Jessica Morgan |Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited |Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited |CIVSB2422638
Case
ESTRELLA et al -v- GRAHAM et al Print
Jul 22, 2024 |Jessica Morgan |Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited |Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited |CIVSB2422539
Case
Baksh -v- Ertoday Print
Jul 23, 2024 |Ronald J Gilbert |Civil Harassment |Civil Harassment |CIVSB2422625
Case
MOORE -v- GIANOPOULOS et al Print
Jul 12, 2024 |Joseph T Ortiz |Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited |Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited |CIVSB2422609
Case
Mcgee -v- Capstone Logistics, LLC et al Print
Jul 24, 2024 |Thomas S Garza |Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited |Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited |CIVSB2422744
Case
Diaz Mireles -v- Salazar Print
Jul 24, 2024 |Ronald J Gilbert |Civil Harassment |Civil Harassment |CIVSB2422763
Case
Jovicevic -v- Labart Print
Jul 23, 2024 |Ronald J Gilbert |Civil Harassment |Civil Harassment |CIVSB2422647
Case
Moore -v- Driver et al Print
Jul 15, 2024 |Khymberli S Apaloo |Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited |Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited |CIVSB2422730
Case
Cantrell Olivia -v- Torrez Print
Jul 26, 2024 |Ronald J Gilbert |Civil Harassment |Civil Harassment |CIVSB2422901
Ruling
FCS058487 - DAILEY, SHARON VS. SOLANO COUNTY SHERIFF (DMS)
Jul 26, 2024 |FCS058487
FCS058487Motion for Leave to AmendTENTATIVE RULINGPlaintiff’s motion for leave to amend is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff has failed tofile a proof of service demonstrating proper and timely service of the motion papers onDefendants.Join ZoomGov Meetinghttps://www.zoomgov.com/j/1602210102?pwd=emlhR29SczExam56NFFqWHFvSitmZz09Meeting ID: 160 221 0102Passcode: 650928One tap mobile+16692545252,,1602210102#,,,,*650928# US (San Jose)+16692161590,,1602210102#,,,,*650928# US (San Jose)
Ruling
Stephen Siefke vs Jimmy Dutra, Jr
Jul 25, 2024 |22CV02174
22CV02174SIEFKE v. DUTRA DEFENDANT DUTRA’S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, SET THREE; FORM INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE; AND SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET FOUR This case involves allegations of child sexual abuse by defendant. According to thecomplaint, in the summer of 2005, plaintiff, then 12 years old, vacationed with defendant, then30 years old, and his parents, in Southern California. It was during this trip that plaintiff allegeshe was molested by defendant. Trial is set to begin on September 3, 2024. These motions were set on shortened time. The motion is granted in part and denied in part, as discussed in detail below. Defendant seeks to compel further responses to request for production of documents, setthree; special interrogatories, set four; and form interrogatories, set one. Request for production, set three
Ruling
NORIEGA vs AGUILAR
Jul 22, 2024 |CVRI2303215
MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULTAND DEFAULT JUDGMENTPURSUANT TO SECTION CCP §473(B) ON COMPLAINT FOR OTHERPERSONAL INJURY/PROPERTYCVRI2303215 NORIEGA VS AGUILAR DAMAGE/WRONGFUL DEATH TORT(OVER $25,000) OF NORMAANGELICA NORIEGA BY GIOVANNYAGUILAR, NANCY GONZALEZ, VILMAAGUILAR, GIO'S PIZZERIA,RESTORATION AGAPETentative Ruling: Grant the motion for relief from default under the attorney-affidavitprovisions of C.C.P. §473(b).4.DEMURRER ON 1ST AMENDEDCOMPLAINT FOR BREACH OFMERINO VS GENERALCVRI2305536 CONTRACT/WARRANTY (OVERMOTORS, LLC$25,000) OF HECTOR MERINO BYGENERAL MOTORS, LLCTentative Ruling: Continue the hearing to August 8, 2024 at 8:30AM. Defendant failed tosatisfy its obligation to meet and confer in person or by telephone with Plaintiff prior tofiling the demurrer and motion to strike portions of the First Amended Complaint (FAC.)Moving party may not waive the requirements set forth in CCP § 430.41 and § 435.5.Moving Defendant is ordered to meet and confer with Plaintiff by telephone or inperson for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that wouldresolve the objections raised in the demurrer and motion to strike. As part of the meetand confer process, Defendant shall identify with legal support the basis of the allegeddeficiencies in the subject pleadings. Plaintiff shall provide legal support for his positionthat the pleadings are legally sufficient or, in the alternative, how they may be furtheramended to cure any legal insufficiencies.After meeting and conferring, Defendant shall, 10 days before the continuedhearing date, set above do one of the following:(1) vacate the hearing on the demurrer and motion to strike;(2) file with the Court a declaration stating the parties have agreed that Plaintiff will filean amended pleading/claim for damages before the date set forth above; or(3) file with the court a declaration stating the means by which the parties met andconferred and identifying the specific objections in the demurrer, and supportingmemorandum of points and authorities that the parties were unable to resolve.The Court will not accept further briefing.5.MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT ON1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT FORMERINO VS GENERALCVRI2305536 BREACH OF CONTRACT/WARRANTYMOTORS, LLC(OVER $25,000) OF HECTOR MERINOBY GENERAL MOTORS, LLCTentative Ruling: Same as above.
Ruling
MUGIHIKO MORIJIRI, AN INDIVIDUAL, ET AL. VS 24 CMN LLC, A BUSINESS ENTITY, EXACT FORM UNKNOWN, ET AL.
Jul 29, 2024 |23STCV20959
Case Number: 23STCV20959 Hearing Date: July 29, 2024 Dept: 53 Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles Central District Department 53 mugihiko morijiri , et al.; Plaintiffs, vs. 24 cmn llc , et al.; Defendants. Case No.: 23STCV20959 Hearing Date: July 29, 2024 Time: 10:00 a.m. [tentative] Order RE: defendants motion to strike portions of complaint MOVING PARTIES: Defendants 24 CMN, LLC and CYN, LLC RESPONDING PARTIES: Plaintiffs Mugihiko Morijiri, Keiko Morijiri, and Zion Morijiri and Ewan Morijiri, by and through their guardian ad litem, Keiko Morijiri Motion to Strike Portions of Complaint The court considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers filed in connection with this motion. DISCUSSION Defendants 24 CMN, LLC and CYN, LLC (Defendants) move the court for an order striking the prayer for punitive damages (Compl., Prayer, p. 23:20) and related allegations (Compl., ¶¶ 117, 161, 172[1]) in the Complaint filed by plaintiffs Mugihiko Morijiri, Keiko Morijiri, and Zion Morijiri and Ewan Morijiri, by and through their guardian ad litem, Keiko Morijiri (Plaintiffs). The court grants Defendants motion to strike the prayer for punitive damages and related allegations because Plaintiffs have not alleged facts establishing (1) Defendants are guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice, and (2) advance knowledge and conscious disregard, authorization, ratification, or act of oppression, fraud, or malice on the part of an officer, director, or managing agent of Defendants. (Code Civ. Proc., § 436; Civ. Code, § 3294, subds. (a), (b).) The court finds that the allegations that Ariana Javaheri, the property supervisor and managing agent of Defendants, informed Plaintiffs that the dark staining on their wall was not mold but mildew and advised Plaintiffs that they would have to pay for the mold test if the results were negative (Compl., ¶¶ 21-23) do not show that Defendants (1) engaged in conduct intended to cause injury to Plaintiffs or despicable conduct carried on with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of Plaintiffs, or (2) engaged in despicable conduct subjecting Plaintiffs to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of their rights. (Civ. Code, § 3294, subds. (c)(1) [defining malice], (c)(2) [defining oppression].) Moreover, while the court acknowledges that Plaintiffs have also alleged that plaintiff Ewan Morijiri was diagnosed with leukemia, is immunocompromised, and was advised not to reside in a premises with mold because it would be injurious and possibly fatal (Compl., ¶ 23), Plaintiffs did not allege facts establishing that Defendants knew of this risk, such that Ariana Javaheris conduct may be considered malicious or oppressive. ORDER The court grants defendants CMN, LLC and CYN, LLCs motion to strike the prayer for punitive damages and paragraphs 117, 161, and 172 of plaintiffs Mugihiko Morijiri, Keiko Morijiri, and Zion Morijiri and Ewan Morijiri, by and through their guardian ad litem, Keiko Morijiris Complaint in this action. The court grants plaintiffs Mugihiko Morijiri, Keiko Morijiri, and Zion Morijiri and Ewan Morijiri, by and through their guardian ad litem, Keiko Morijiri 20 days leave to file a First Amended Complaint that cures the defects set forth in this ruling. The court orders defendants CMN, LLC and CYN, LLC to give notice of this ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 29, 2024 _____________________________ Robert B. Broadbelt III Judge of the Superior Court [1] The court notes that the notice of motion erroneously states this allegation is in paragraph 171. (Notice of Mot., p. 2, ¶ 3.)
Ruling
PARKER vs SAHARA DENTAL
Jul 22, 2024 |CVSW2401629
PARKER VS JAMAL DENTAL MOTION TO BE RELIEVED ASCVSW2401629CORPORATION COUNSEL FOR KIMBERLY A. PARKERTentative Ruling: GRANT and Approve the Proposed Order.
Ruling
CHAUDHRY vs SHARMA, D.D.S
Jul 23, 2024 |CVRI2202087
MOTION FOR AN ORDER REQUIRINGCHAUDHRY VS SHARMA,CVRI2202087 PLAINTIFF TO POST AND.D.SUNDERTAKINGTentative Ruling: Appearances required.
Ruling
Henao, Nicole vs. Lawrie, Justin Harris et al
Aug 05, 2024 |S-CV-0051949
S-CV-0051949 Henao, Nicole vs. Lawrie, Justin Harris et al** NOTE: telephonic appearances are strongly encouragedAppearance required. Complaint is not at issue - Need responsive pleading,default or dismissal as to Defendant(s): Lawrie, Justin Harris; Lawrie, MichelleAdditionally, no proof of service has been filed as to Defendant(s): Lawrie, JustinHarris; Lawrie, Michelle
Ruling
SIU vs SIU, et al.
Jul 25, 2024 |Civil Unlimited (Other Non-Personal Injury/Pro...) |21CV000063
21CV000063: SIU vs SIU, et al. 07/25/2024 Hearing on Motion to Strike First and Fourth Causes of Action; filed by Kuai Cheong Siu (Defendant) + in Department 25Tentative Ruling - 07/24/2024 Jenna WhitmanThe Hearing on Motion to Strike First and Fourth Causes of Action; filed by Kuai Cheong Siu(Defendant) + scheduled for 07/25/2024 is continued to 08/22/2024 at 03:00 PM in Department25 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse .The Hearing on Demurrer DEMURRER TO FIRST, SECOND, FOURTH, FIFTH, SIXTH,SEVENTH, EIGHTH, NINTH, AND TENTH CAUSES OF ACTION IN FIRST AMENDEDCOMPLAINT; filed by Kuai Cheong Siu (Defendant) + scheduled for 07/25/2024 is continuedto 08/22/2024 at 03:00 PM in Department 25 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse .The Hearing on Motion - Other Joinder; filed by Roberto's Inc. (Defendant) scheduled for07/25/2024 is continued to 08/22/2024 at 03:00 PM in Department 25 at Rene C. DavidsonCourthouse .
Document
Incentax, LLC -v- Gan et al Print
May 25, 2022 |Joseph T Ortiz |Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited |Business Tort/Unfair Business Practice Unlimited |CIVSB2210175
Document
Spatola-Stieg -v- Zahir et al Print
Jul 15, 2024 |Stephanie Thornton-Harris |Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited |Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited |CIVSB2422771
Document
Jackson et al -v- Green Tree Inn et al Print
Jan 31, 2024 |David E Driscoll |Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited |Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited |CIVSB2400816
Document
MURTAZA -v- LOYDE COOK et al Print
May 31, 2023 |Wilfred J Schneider, Jr. |Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited |Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited |CIVSB2312482
Document
Grimes -v- Citrus Nursing Center et al Print
Jan 28, 2022 |Gilbert Ochoa |Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited |Other PI/PD/WD Unlimited |CIVSB2202201
Document
CREAMISTRY -V- DYNAMITE SIGN Print
May 26, 2016 |Gilbert Ochoa |PI personal injury not MV |Personal Injury Non-Motor Vehicle Unlimited |CIVDS1612496
Document
Fergerson -v- Brook et al Print
Oct 03, 2022 |Apaloo, Khymberli |Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited |Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited |CIVSB2221928
Document
Villalva -v- City of Victorville et al. Print
Jun 15, 2023 |John M Pacheco |Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited |Auto PI/PD/WD Unlimited |CIVSB2313768
